The end of PPT labour is near.

The end of PPT labour is near.

I started medical school in 2004. Most classes were already going to Powerpoint, and with clinical practice, the war against PPT began in earnest.

I have almost all the slides I've made since I got a specialist, and I've made 520 slides in 12 years to date. I've made about 45 slides a year.

When I was making PPT, the most common evaluations I heard were 'You made it better than I thought' and 'It's not bad'. I wasn't the one who produced the highest quality PPT. So after receiving some research funding, I always left the slides I made to other companies for design.

Even today, we have researchers who are dedicated to making PPTs. I'm the one who makes the whole story and turns it into a pretty slide. Of course, the more you pay attention to it, the better the slide becomes. The problem is that the quality doesn't get proportionate to the labor input.

Happily, with the combination of Gemini 3.0 and nanobanana and NotebookLM that came out last week, I think the AI transition has been completed for the right quality PPT work.

A lot of people asked me to do it, so I was organizing at length how to make a good PPT with AI, but I don't have to do that anymore. It's really simple.

"Subscribe to Gemini, upload the materials you want to make on Notebooklm, and change them."

Of course, it's not the best quality. A really cool PPT comes out when I have a lot to talk about with good content. And I also need to think about how to tell the story in advance. But this is the part that corresponds to the identity of the researcher and the presenter, and our work is now over in terms of technical schematization, content organization, and neat readability.

I'm sad that it doesn't take 30 minutes to make a slide for tomorrow's lecture, and it's so nice and complicated.