The priest of the doctrine wrote about

The priest of the doctrine wrote about pre-marriage sex in the Annals of Misashi today. Just in time, I was reading a part about how Kant's casual sex is different from liberal philosophy. From the standpoint of liberal philosophy, the casual sex performed by each other's will is not a problem. Because human free will is viewed as a high value...
However, although Kant's position views freedom as the highest and most important value, this freedom is not a freedom of general concepts, but a liberalism that applies my own law that presupposes seeing it as a value for human purposes only. Therefore, Kant defines casual sex as not correct. This is because it uses humans as a means of pleasure. Freedom is recognized when humans are respected in themselves and used only for purposes. Therefore, Kant's position is that sexual intercourse other than a married person is morally undesirable.

Gacholic's stance is similar. He argues that relationships other than his wife are not desirable in God's eyes because humans must be recognized as the purpose, that is, the mother of God, and sex must be held on the premise that love, responsibility for the person, and burabura are included.

Although these ideas and ideas may be accepted in the present era, I often think that Kant's philosophy is worth studying.

I study philosophy because I have a small belief that I will make consistent judgments about the world, especially when I see conservatives and progressives interpreting political events differently or responding differently to similar things.

In addition, philosophy is a very interesting discipline. It's not difficult, it just seems like a proverb that makes life easier.

I recommend a light philosophy book for any philosophy.

One book I read recently said Schopenhauer said this
There's a saying that the world is an idea that I created, and I think it's true...
The world changes depending on what I think...